Ctrip and Trip.com Group Partner Integration

Ctrip and Trip.com Group represent one of the largest travel businesses globally by revenue and bookings. Ctrip serves Chinese-market travelers; Trip.com is the international brand; Skyscanner (Group-owned) is the global flight metasearch platform; Qunar serves Chinese travel search. For travel platforms targeting Asia-Pacific or Chinese-speaking audiences, Trip.com Group partnerships represent meaningful inventory and traffic relationships. This page covers what Ctrip and Trip.com Group offer in 2026, how partner integration works, and where these partnerships fit in a broader travel-tech distribution strategy. The Trip.com Group structure matters for partnership decisions. The various brands serve different audiences with shared underlying technology and supplier relationships. Most travel-tech platforms partnering with the group engage with Trip.com (international) for affiliate or B2B access rather than Ctrip directly because international partnerships are more accessible. Skyscanner operates somewhat independently within the group with its own partner programs for metasearch. Use this hub guide alongside our broader pieces on Booking.com Affiliate Integration for the comparable affiliate path, Expedia API and Affiliate for another major partnership context, and travel API integration for the architecture context.

Looking to partner with Trip.com Group brands?

Request a Demo with Trip.com or Skyscanner partner integration
Get a Quote with partnership scope and integration timeline
• WhatsApp-friendly: "Share demo slots + Trip.com Group partnership plan."

Get Pricing

Trip.com Group Brand Family

Trip.com Group operates several brands serving different markets and use cases. Ctrip is the foundational Chinese-market brand, founded in 1999 and built into the dominant Chinese OTA over two decades. The platform serves Chinese travelers with flights, hotels, packages, and travel services in Mandarin. Ctrip has deep supplier relationships across Asia-Pacific and growing international coverage. Trip.com is the international brand serving global travelers in multiple languages. The platform launched as the group's expansion into non-Chinese markets and has grown significantly. Trip.com competes with Booking.com, Expedia, and other global OTAs in international markets. Skyscanner is a global flight metasearch platform acquired by Ctrip in 2016 (now Trip.com Group). Skyscanner operates somewhat independently within the group, comparing flight prices across many OTAs and direct airlines. The brand has strong consumer presence in Europe, North America, and other international markets. Qunar is a Chinese-market travel search platform that complements Ctrip's offering with metasearch and budget-focused options. The platform serves price-sensitive Chinese travelers with broader inventory comparison than Ctrip's direct booking flow. For partner travel platforms, the right brand to engage with depends on the target audience and business model. For Chinese-market focus, Ctrip directly through B2B or strategic partnerships. For broader Asia-Pacific or international travelers, Trip.com through affiliate or B2B partnerships. For metasearch participation, Skyscanner partner programs. For price-comparison alongside Chinese audiences, Qunar. The brands share underlying technology and supplier relationships but operate distinct partner programs because the audiences and integration patterns differ. The full partnership context for travel platforms is in our piece on travel API integration.

To help Google and AI tools place this page correctly, here are the most relevant guides for major OTA partnerships.

Explore related guides:

Trip.com Affiliate And B2B Partnership Paths

Trip.com runs several partnership programs at different scales. Trip.com Affiliate is the referral-based path open to most travel content sites and small-to-mid OTAs. Affiliates embed search widgets, deep links, or banners on their sites; travelers click through to Trip.com for booking with affiliate tracking. Setup is straightforward (1 to 4 weeks), settlement happens monthly, and commission rates are competitive with other major affiliate programs. Best fit for travel content sites, comparison platforms, and small OTAs targeting global or APAC audiences. Trip.com Partner Solutions (the B2B platform) gives qualified partners deeper API access for building their own search and booking interfaces using Trip.com's inventory. Approval is gated by traffic volume, business model fit, and technical capability. Best fit for established travel-tech platforms with the engineering capacity for full API integration. Skyscanner partner programs operate independently from the broader Trip.com Group structure. Airlines and OTAs participate in Skyscanner's flight metasearch through CPC-based or commission-based partnerships - similar to Wego or Kayak metasearch participation covered in our pieces on those platforms. Travel content sites can also use Skyscanner's affiliate widgets for flight search monetization. The integration patterns for Trip.com programs follow standard OTA partnership models. Affiliate integration uses widgets and deep links with affiliate tracking - patterns covered in detail in our piece on Booking.com Affiliate Integration. B2B Partner Solutions integration follows broader hotel and flight API patterns covered in our piece on Expedia API. Approval and onboarding for Trip.com partnerships is gated by partner type. Affiliate enrollment is open to most legitimate travel sites with relevant audiences. B2B Partner Solutions approval requires demonstrated volume and business model fit. Strategic partnerships at the Group level are negotiated case-by-case with significant time investment. Commercial terms vary by program. Affiliate commission rates are typically 1 to 3 percent on flight bookings and 4 to 7 percent on hotel bookings. B2B Partner Solutions terms are negotiated based on volume and partnership scope. Skyscanner CPC bidding follows metasearch market dynamics. Geographic considerations matter for Trip.com partnerships specifically. The platform's strongest audience overlap is Asia-Pacific with growing presence in international markets. For partners with significant APAC audience, Trip.com partnerships drive meaningful traffic. For partners focused exclusively on Western markets, Trip.com is one option among several with less unique strength than in APAC.

Want to evaluate Trip.com partnership for your platform?

Request a Demo with Trip.com Affiliate or Partner Solutions on a comparable site
Get a Quote with partnership scope and integration roadmap
• WhatsApp-friendly: "Share demo slots + Trip.com partnership evaluation."

Speak to Our Experts

Where Trip.com Group Fits In Distribution

Most travel platforms running multi-supplier or multi-partner distribution face the question of how to incorporate Trip.com Group brands. For platforms targeting global audiences, Trip.com Affiliate is one of several major affiliate programs alongside Booking.com Affiliate, Expedia Affiliate, and others. The decision factors include audience overlap (Trip.com's APAC strength matters for platforms with APAC traveler base), commercial terms (rates vary slightly across programs), and operational simplicity (running multiple affiliate programs requires multi-program management). Most successful travel content sites participate in 5 to 15 active affiliate programs with no single program exceeding 30 percent of revenue. For platforms targeting APAC or Chinese audiences specifically, Trip.com Group partnerships often deserve primary or co-primary status. The group's deep supplier relationships in those markets produce inventory and commercial advantages other partners cannot match. For Chinese-market platforms, Ctrip directly through B2B partnerships may be the most relevant path. For metasearch participation, Skyscanner is one of three or four major flight metasearch platforms (alongside Kayak, Google Flights, Wego) that competitive flight-focused OTAs typically participate in. The patterns are similar to other metasearch partnerships covered in our pieces on Wego and Google Travel. For B2B travel platforms, Trip.com Partner Solutions provides one of several options for hotel and flight inventory access. Score against alternatives like HotelBeds, Expedia Partner Solutions, and direct chain integrations based on inventory fit, geographic strength, and commercial terms. The decision framework for adding Trip.com Group brands specifically: do you have audience overlap with APAC or Chinese travelers? Do you need flight metasearch presence on Skyscanner specifically? Are you adding affiliate programs broadly to monetize travel content? Are you building B2B inventory access alongside other suppliers? Each question maps to a different Trip.com Group brand and partnership path. Operational reality for any Trip.com Group partnership includes the standard travel-tech patterns - feed maintenance for B2B and metasearch, conversion tracking for affiliate, customer service workflow for partner-mediated bookings, and ongoing relationship management with the relevant partner team. The discipline is similar across major OTA partnerships; the audience fit is what makes specific partnerships uniquely valuable.

Want a multi-partner distribution strategy?

Request a Demo with Trip.com alongside other major partner programs
Get a Quote with partnership prioritization for your audience
• WhatsApp-friendly: "Share demo slots + multi-partner strategy."

Request a Demo

Operating Trip.com Group Partnerships

Once a Trip.com Group partnership is in place, operational disciplines apply. Conversion tracking and attribution through the relevant partner dashboard plus your own analytics for cross-platform attribution. Track click-to-booking conversion, cost per acquisition (where CPC applies), and revenue per partner-source visit weekly. The data drives optimization decisions - which content drives Trip.com bookings best, which keywords convert through Skyscanner, which markets pay back at higher rates. Feed maintenance for B2B Partner Solutions or Skyscanner partner programs requires the same discipline as other feed-based partnerships. Submit accurate, timely, and complete feeds; build automated quality monitoring; address feed delivery failures quickly. The patterns generalize across feed-based metasearch and aggregator partnerships. Customer service workflow for partner-mediated bookings includes handoff patterns when travelers contact your support but the booking happened on Trip.com. Document the workflow and train support agents accordingly. Most issues route to Trip.com's customer service for actual booking modifications; your support handles questions, complaints, and the relationship layer. Reconciliation against Trip.com Group's settlement files follows standard partner-program patterns. Match every conversion or transaction against the settlement, track refunds and cancellations, watch for any discrepancies that signal tracking issues. Build automated reconciliation rather than manual processes. Relationship management matters at scale. Trip.com Group's partner teams support significant partners with quarterly business reviews, account management, and strategic alignment conversations. Build relationships with the partner team; engagement matters for resolving issues and influencing roadmap. Cross-brand coordination within Trip.com Group is sometimes possible. Partners running both Trip.com Affiliate and Skyscanner participation may benefit from coordinated optimization across the brands. Engage the partner team about cross-brand strategy if your platform's scope supports it. Long-term strategic considerations include Trip.com Group's continued expansion in international markets, Skyscanner's evolution as metasearch landscape shifts, and the broader competitive dynamics with Booking Holdings, Expedia Group, and other major travel companies. Partnerships with major OTA groups are long-term relationships that benefit from consistent operational discipline rather than one-time integration. The platforms that win on multi-partner travel distribution treat each partnership as ongoing operational work. Optimize tracking weekly. Maintain feeds reliably. Build relationships with partner teams. Plan for renewal negotiations strategically. The compounding effects on revenue, audience reach, and brand presence in target markets take quarters to fully appear, but they appear reliably for partners that operate with discipline. Trip.com Group brands are one piece of a healthy travel partnership mix - choose the role each plays based on your audience and ambition, integrate methodically, and operate the relationships as long-term assets rather than transactional setups.

FAQs

Q1. What is Ctrip?

A major Chinese OTA founded in 1999, now part of Trip.com Group which also operates Trip.com (international), Skyscanner (metasearch), Qunar, and other travel businesses. Trip.com Group is one of the largest travel companies in the world by revenue.

Q2. What is Trip.com Group?

The parent company that operates Ctrip (Chinese market), Trip.com (international), Skyscanner (global metasearch), Qunar (Chinese travel search), and other travel brands. Headquartered in Shanghai with significant operations across Asia-Pacific and growing international presence.

Q3. Does Ctrip offer a partner API?

Trip.com Group operates partner programs through several brands. Trip.com runs an Affiliate program for travel content sites and a B2B partner platform. Ctrip's partnerships are primarily Chinese-market focused. Skyscanner has its own partner programs.

Q4. How does Trip.com Affiliate work?

Referral-based program where travel content sites earn commission by referring travelers to Trip.com for booking. Affiliates embed widgets, deep links, or banners; the booking happens on Trip.com with affiliate tracking. Settlement happens monthly.

Q5. What inventory does Trip.com Group offer to partners?

Flights through GDS and direct airline relationships, hotels through aggregator and chain partnerships, ground transport, vacation packages, and various travel services. Coverage particularly strong in Asia-Pacific markets.

Q6. How can my travel platform partner with Trip.com Group?

Affiliate partnerships through Trip.com are open to most travel content sites. B2B partnerships through Trip.com's partner platform are gated by volume and business model. Strategic partnerships at the Group level are negotiated case-by-case.

Q7. What is the difference between Ctrip and Trip.com?

Ctrip is the Chinese-market brand serving primarily Chinese travelers in Mandarin. Trip.com is the international brand serving global travelers in multiple languages. Both operate under Trip.com Group with shared technology and supplier relationships.

Q8. How does Skyscanner fit in Trip.com Group?

Skyscanner is a global flight metasearch site acquired by Ctrip in 2016. Operates as metasearch comparing prices across OTAs and direct airlines. Runs its own partner programs for OTAs and airlines wanting visibility in flight search results.

Q9. How does Trip.com Group commission work?

Affiliate commission on Trip.com bookings typically 1 to 3 percent on flights, 4 to 7 percent on hotels. B2B partnerships have negotiated rates based on volume. Skyscanner partner programs operate on CPC-based models.

Q10. Should my OTA partner with Trip.com or Ctrip?

If audience or operations have significant Asia-Pacific or Chinese-traveler overlap, Trip.com Group partnerships drive meaningful traffic. For Chinese-market focus, Ctrip directly. For broader global reach, Trip.com. Score against alternatives based on geographic fit.